http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/ Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:58:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2251 Shawn Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:06:58 +0000 http://new.vegblog.org/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2251 "The department would look at whether the contract with the company will continue" Shouldn't they know the answer to that? "Dumping debris" Are you fucking kidding! Who is the idiot the park service or the reporter? “The department would look at whether the contract with the company will continue” Shouldn’t they know the answer to that? “Dumping debris” Are you fucking kidding! Who is the idiot the park service or the reporter?

]]> http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2250 Christiane Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:10:53 +0000 http://new.vegblog.org/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2250 Wow - that is really sad.... Wow - that is really sad….

]]> http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2249 vegancore Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:33:24 +0000 http://new.vegblog.org/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2249 That's disgusting. Just as disturbing, though, is that the problem was more about dumping "hazardous waste" where it shouldn't have been dumped than it was the animals themselves. Ugh. That’s disgusting. Just as disturbing, though, is that the problem was more about dumping “hazardous waste” where it shouldn’t have been dumped than it was the animals themselves. Ugh.

]]> http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2248 Michael G. Richard Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:33:01 +0000 http://new.vegblog.org/2006/02/03/links-for-2006-02-04/#comment-2248 How sad :( How sad :(

]]>