<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beef recall expanded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2002 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.vegblog.org/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-736</guid>
		<description>Better stop eating lettuce too. Outbreaks of e. coli on lettuce will probably become even more common if the "organic" kooks get their way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better stop eating lettuce too. Outbreaks of e. coli on lettuce will probably become even more common if the &#8220;organic&#8221; kooks get their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2002 05:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.vegblog.org/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>By no means are they immune, but the problem is much more widespread amongst meat simply because of the slaughtering process... I've read some pretty high estimates (I want to say 75%, but I'm not positive about that) with regards to how much meat actually is actually affected by E. coli at some point, and is only killed by the (apparently imperfect) processes in the slaughterhouse or cooking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By no means are they immune, but the problem is much more widespread amongst meat simply because of the slaughtering process&#8230; I&#8217;ve read some pretty high estimates (I want to say 75%, but I&#8217;m not positive about that) with regards to how much meat actually is actually affected by E. coli at some point, and is only killed by the (apparently imperfect) processes in the slaughterhouse or cooking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry M.</title>
		<link>http://www.vegblog.org/archive/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.vegblog.org/2002/07/19/beef-recall-expanded/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Since when are vegetarians immune to E Coli? The most massive E Coli outbreak in recent years was from Odwalla apple juice which killed one child, and made dozens of people very sick, all because Odwalla refused to pasteurize their juice. They performed a massive recall of millions of units in order to prevent harming to more people. At least with ground beef you know if you cook it properly before eating it, there is no problem even if it is contaminated. Who cooks their apple juice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when are vegetarians immune to E Coli? The most massive E Coli outbreak in recent years was from Odwalla apple juice which killed one child, and made dozens of people very sick, all because Odwalla refused to pasteurize their juice. They performed a massive recall of millions of units in order to prevent harming to more people. At least with ground beef you know if you cook it properly before eating it, there is no problem even if it is contaminated. Who cooks their apple juice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
